The science of cramming before exams

Exam period is over and most of you are probably relaxing on a sunny beach, sipping cocktails under palm trees in this very moment. I bet, however, that if you think back at how you felt a couple of month ago, during the madness that is final exams, when sleeping was a luxury and eating at regular hours just a blurry memory from the past, you still get the chills down your spine. “I will never leave it to the last minute like this!” “I promise myself I will study all semester next year” and so on… We’ve all been there!

Then the summer goes by, the new semester starts and nothing changes. Sounds familiar?

Well, let’s be honest, you’re going to find yourself in that situation again. Panic-filled last minute revision the day before an exam is a fate that no student can avoid. But if you’ve got do it, then at least do it right.

Cramming huge amounts of information in your mind before an exam is a bit like storing lots of data in your computer’s RAM instead of safely copying it to your hard drive. It’s there, it’s readily accessible, but not for long. However, a recent study has just shown that the time of learning before going to sleep can affect your ability to store new information in your short and long term memory.

The experimental design is very straightforward. A bunch of young students were asked to learn two memory tasks. One task involved the use of declarative memory (word-pair association task) and the other involved the use of procedural memory (or motor memory, in other words they had to learn a finger-tapping sequence).

One group had to learn the tasks in the afternoon while the other had to learn them in the evening. They then had to go to bed (I know what you’re thinking, but yes, it is important to sleep even before exams!) and were tested the following days to see how much they could remember.

Results? Well, interestingly the students who did their learning in the afternoon performed better at the word-pairing exercise the following day, but didn’t do very well at the finger-tapping sequence. However, the students who had the learning session in the evening scored opposite results, being much better at the motor memory task than at the word-pairing exercise.

So, be smart about it. If you are determined to learn those two hundred names of enzymes and proteins with ridiculous names (the chemical name of the protein Titin, anyone?) the day before the exam, try to get started before 3pm. If, however, you need to learn that new difficult piece of contemporary dodecaphonic music on your trumpet, go ahead, and make sure you do it as late as possible*, just before going to bed.

* I will not be held responsible for any act of violence or physical harm that may be attributable to the ire of your furious neighbours.

If you want to find out more about short-term memory formation and why learning things at different times of the day can affect the consolidation of memories overnight, read the original article here.

*** If you’d like to contribute to Fastbleep Biology notes, why not write an article about memory formation and consolidation for the Neuroscience chapter? Get in touch with the editor (who, coincidently, is me!) at neurobiology(at)editor.fastbleepbiology.com. End of the promotional message, beep ***

Biology Notes is Live!

Following the great success of medical notes, we have created a site for biology notes that is valuable for students whether they be life scientists, pre-clinical medics, pharmacists or anatomy students. The aim of biology notes is to create articles for revision that are engaging and enjoyable to read and show how amazing biology can be.

So if you want that confusing lecture explained, just want a little extra reading or want revision material for exams, Fastbleep Biology Notes is the place to come.

The unique element about the notes at Fastbleep is that they are written by students, for students. So why not get involved and become an author! As the site is newly launched and as we continue to expand our chapters, we have lots of articles waiting to be written for all our chapters:

 

Cell Biology
Molecular Biology
Genetics
Developmental Biology
Immunology
Body Systems
Pharmacology
Pathology
Microbiology
Cancer Biology
Biochemistry
Neurobiology

Our dedicated editors, supported by the Biology Core Team (Jo Salter Editor-in-chief, Emma Pond Managing Editor and Becky Brading Head of Biology Schools) are ready to help authors produce useful and engaging revision notes for fellow students.

For more information take a look at our website http://www.fastbleep.com/ or contact biology@fastbleep.com

What the editorial process is like at Fastbleep Biology

Chloe, our editor for Developmental Biology explains the editorial process at Fastbleep Biology.

When I got the job as developmental biology editor for Fastbleep Biology Notes, I was really happy! I went and told everyone at work and was pleasantly regaled with ‘well done’s’ and ‘good for you’. This was quickly followed by the question, “so what exactly does an editor do?”

Firstly, editors at Fastbleep have to decide what articles their chapter should contain and how these are going to be organised. It is important to think what students using the website will want to read articles about.

Next; need to get some people to write these articles! As well as recruiting authors ourselves via specific or less specific targeting, we also get help from the people above us – Emma, who is our managing editor and Jo, who is our editor-in chief. So now you have several people writing several different articles, all at different stages of the process. A LOT of emails are exchanged – you have to remember everyone’s name, what article they are writing, what stage they are up to and any deadlines you may have set. I find a good colour coded table and an online calendar helps me out here!

So now you have a lot of articles coming through – many of which are about things you might not have studied before. Now it is time to do lots and lots of reading! Reading journal articles and reviews so that I can understand the articles being sent to me. Then reading the articles and agreeing with the author changes that will make the article suitable for the website – again, lots of emails flying backwards and forwards. Now final checks can be made, and again and again. By this point, you may be able to recite some parts of the article you are about to approve. Once more, then I hit the approve button and hope that Jo will do the same! Once Jo has approved the article I can tell the authors that their hard work will be up in lights very soon. This is a really nice part of the job!

I really enjoy being an editor at Fastbleep Biology Notes. As a PhD student by day, I read a lot of papers closely connected to my project. Since I have been editing I have read articles and papers on everything from vascular development to Xenopus gastrulation. I also really like having a relationship (all be it mainly via email) with all the different authors. You meet and get to work with all different types of people, which is great!

Contact Chloe here for available articles within her section.

Writing opportunities in our Pathology Notes chapter

Our pathology chapter has a number of articles available for writing. Whether you are an undergraduate in the life sciences, a medic or postgraduate  researcher with a keen interest in pathological mechanisms of disease there will be an article suited to you. Here are just some that are available:

  • Environmental and genetic causes of disease
  • Cellular response to injury
  • Common digestive system pathologies
  • How does the liver cope with drug overdose
  • Cellular events in asthma

This is a fantastic opportunity to get published, experience the peer review process and pass on you knowledge to others.

Either comment below for more information on writing for Pathology or email: pathology@editor.fastbleepbiology.com

You can also check out what writing an article for us involves here and some guidance here.

Careers in life sciences: A day in the life of an associate medical writer

Part of Fastbleep Biology Schools will involve talking to and educating young people interested in studying life sciences at HE level about careers that are available after they finish. As part of this we have asked a number of people with a background in life sciences to write about what they did after their degrees. This week, Jo (Editor-in-Chief of Fastbleep Biology) discusses her life as an associate medical writer.

Medical writing is a great career for those who enjoy science but not being in a lab. You still get to learn about new scientific breakthroughs and use many of the skills developed during science degrees. So here is what a day in the life of a medical writer can be like:

So here is what a day in the life of a medical writer can be like:

9am- Arrive at work. Start checking the many emails that have amassed since I left work last night while I eat my breakfast. As many of our clients are in different time zones I usually have at least 10 emails to sort through by 9am!

9.15am- One of my emails was comments from an author for a manuscript draft I have written. I go through each comment, adding them into the manuscript. One of the comments is the addition of some extra data, so I must trawl through the study report to find the data and decide how best the data would be displayed in this paper. I make a table and a bar chart just to be on the safe side.

I also email the co-authors to remind them we need everyone to comment on the draft.

10.30- weekly team meeting to discuss how all the promotional projects are going. I get told I will be taking over a newsletter project.

11.00- I have to put some slides together for a symposium presentation. We already have slides on most of the data for this presentation so I just need to go through all our current slides and pick out all the relevant ones. I also have to check if any slides need updating for the particular audience.

11.30- Notice some cake has appeared on the kitchen table. I cannot resist.

11.35- I poster I wrote has come back from being styled. I must check everything is the same as on the word doc I sent. I notice some numbers in a table are wrong and the graphs are the wrong colours. I send back to studio and ask really nicely if it can be done by tonight.

12.00- Lunch time! This means pasta salad and a chance to check facebook and read my magazine.

13.00- I have a look at previous issues of the newsletter I am taking over. I also have an email on what needs to be included in this issue. Start compiling the first draft.

14.30- My boss gives me back my draft outline for a manuscript. I do all the amends and make some notes to remember for next time.

15.00- A client emails to say they are pleased with a meeting highlights book I wrote. I am super pleased.

15.05- Go back to the slides I did earlier, to check before I email them to my boss, realise I need to rewrite the conclusions.

15.30- I continue with a manuscript draft from the other day. I am planning to finish the discussion and conclusion today.

16.45- The poster from today comes back from styling amends. I check it again for mistakes. All the corrections have been made, now the poster can be printed, YAY!

17.00- Make sure I know what I have planned for tomorrow and send a few emails before I head home.

By fastbleepbiology Posted in Careers Tagged

Careers in life sciences: Put the pipette down and step away from the bench

Part of Fastbleep Biology Schools will involve talking to and educating young people interested in studying life sciences at HE level about careers that are available after they finish. As part of this we have asked a number of people with a background in life sciences to write about what they did after their degrees. This week, Jo (Editor-in-Chief of Fastbleep Biology) discusses her brave decision to leave her PhD and go on the hunt for other career options within the life sciences.

Doing a PhD seemed a really good idea at the time. Why wouldn’t it! I love science and how awesome it can be. However, sometime in my first year of my PhD I came to the conclusion that while I love science I don’t love being a scientist. Deep down a PhD was probably not a wise choice seeing as I never really loved lab work, but then I didn’t hate it like some of my peers. My academic grades pushed me along the logical path of undergraduate degree to masters (to ‘test out’ research).While my masters year was tough, some might even say gruelling, I somehow convinced myself that a PhD would be different. Choosing a project I really believed in would transform the mundane aspects of lab work into lovingly planned out experiments that would set the scientific world alight. Or so I
thought.

The day I was presented with a cow tail and a Bosch saw to dissect it with, it really dawned on me I had vastly underestimated what I’d let myself into. I persevered and managed to continue with the PhD for the first year. It was around the time I was spending every day crying before entering the lab that I realised that maybe research wasn’t for me. How had I let this get to the point where a PhD was making me unhappy and physically ill? Unlike a job in the real world, leaving a PhD is still seen as rather taboo, gasps of ‘you’re leaving???’, ‘It’s only another 2 years’. I tried to make it work. I put my initial anxiety down to adjusting to a new project, new epic 4 year timescale and new colleagues. However as time went on it was clear that a PhD just wasn’t for me and I couldn’t cope with it for another 3 years. Luckily I had really supportive supervisors who helped me see that while they obviously would want me to stay, a PhD isn’t the be all and end all of life.

If you want to stay in academia, carve out a research career for yourself, then yes you should probably stick with it as a PhD is essential for that career. If like me, you still love science, just not being a scientist, then there are options for you without a PhD. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a scary decision to make, turning your back on 3 years worth of funding and the chance to discover something new and be called Dr, but if you are truly unhappy in a PhD, leaving is the brave decision and there are so many science related jobs to look into.

I decided my strengths and passion came from writing my reports, presentations and posters so looked into medical writing. In this position I now write articles, newsletters and conference material for pharmaceutical companies’ clinical trial data. Other potential career paths I investigated included scientific editing and publishing, healthcare market research, public engagement and teaching. If you can pinpoint what is it about science that you love, you can start to find the science based career path that suits you.

Getting a job isn’t easy though. As the fairy stories say, you have to kiss a lot of frogs to find your prince. I applied for around 40 jobs, got 4 interviews and 1 job offer. This took 3 months of perfecting covering letters, completing writing tests and undertaking interviews but I finally got my dream job, Associate Medical Writer, not a pipette or Bosch saw in sight!

Check back next week for Jo’s post on her life as an associate medical writer.

By fastbleepbiology Posted in Careers Tagged

Careers in life sciences: Roller-coaster PhD, fasten your seatbelt and enjoy the ride!

Part of Fastbleep Biology Schools will involve talking to and educating young people interested in studying life sciences at HE level about careers that are available after they finish. As part of this we have asked a number of people with a background in life sciences to write about what they did after their degrees. This week, Sue (Editor of Pathology in Fastbleep Biology) discusses her life as a PhD student.

When I started my PhD in Physiology at University of Manchester I already had a bit lab experience during my previous Biotechnology studies and I loved it. So I was really looking forward to get some experiments done. However, at the very beginning I was busy getting to know my PhD topic by reading a lot of literature/scientific papers for the literature report. It was sometimes a bit overwhelming when I looked up keywords on the database and found 20.000 or more entries. After the literature report I could finally do hands-on science. The 1st year ended with writing the continuation report. So the first year was really busy but also very exciting! Everything was new and there was so much to learn, people to get to know, finding your way around.

The 2nd year was the most relaxed one. I already knew what to do and hey it was the 2nd year…still so much time left :-P

At the beginning of the 3rd year I had the feeling everyone (unfortunately including me) started to panic because experiments didn’t work as planned. That was the first time when I could truly confirm what a wise scientist said: Research means 99% failure, frustration and 1% success! Especially in Life Sciences you work with different living organisms like cells and use rather complicated methods. So a lot of things can go wrong even without you realising. For example I have never managed a special staining method which is used in my lab. Actually there was only one person who could manage great results although he did completely the same steps as me. Of course I persuaded him into helping me ;-) That’s also what science is about: Networking and making collaborations!

Another thing I wasn’t prepared of was the procrastination. After all you have 3 to 4 years for your PhD and it really needs a lot of will power to get some things done without getting too distracted by other (non-PhD) stuff. I also realised it only upsets you when you compare your amount of work you’ve put into your PhD project with other PhD students. Some students are blessed with easy- going and motivating supervisors, luck during research, being able to publish several papers without any problems ….and others aren’t. Every PhD project has its own history!

Anyway: If I had the chance would I do it again? Hell yeah!!! To be honest I’m not that keen on doing research any more but even that realisation is a great result! I’ve met a lot of normal, inspiring, funny and even weird people outside or within University. That alone made it all worth it! Finally let me give you one piece of advice: If you are thinking about doing a PhD have a look at several different projects. Don’t hesitate to contact the supervisors directly and ask them questions before you even apply for the position. I think it’s best to let your heart choose which PhD project to begin because it will be ‘YOUR baby’ for up to 4 years. So you better LOVE it! (at least at the beginning) ;)

Sue is the editor of our pathology chapter, contact her here.

By fastbleepbiology Posted in Careers Tagged

Available articles in our Body Systems chapter

Our Body Systems chapter will be primarily aimed at anatomists as well as pre-clinical medics. This chapter has a potential to be very successful and currently has lots of available articles to get involved in. Here are just a few that are available…

  • The anatomy and structure of the digestive system
  • The control of heart rate and blood pressure
  • An overview of the osmoregulatory system
  • Types of hormone and receptor system
  • Connective tissue: Enter the matrix

Articles are open to life sciences students (undergrad or postgrad), medical students and researchers.

Either comment below for more information on writing for Body Systems email: body.systems@fastbleepbiology.com

You can also check out what writing an article for us involves here and some guidance here.

What it’s like to write an article for Fastbleep Biology

So I’ve just submitted my first article for Fastbleep Biology. As Editor in chief of biology notes, I felt some pressure to write a really great article that encompassed all I wanted from the ideal revision note. So here is how it happened.

I spent some time browsing the available article options, and settled on Autophagy in the Cell Biology chapter as my first article. I spent my 10 week project for my masters study autophagy in the intervertebral disc, so I have a pretty good grasp of the topic.

To begin my article I needed to think what I wanted from the perfect revision note. I wanted something easy to read, memorable and full of the key info needed to answer an exam question. I dug out my masters work on autophagy and set about making my article a fun version of all the info I’d gathered on autophagy. I also made a jazzy diagram as I know a picture is often easier to remember than loads of text, an examiners love it when you draw one in exams!

Here’s a sneak peak at what the result was. For the real thing you’ll have to visit Fastbleep biology notes when it launches!

Autophagy- tidying up, survival on a shoestring and death by over cleansing

Autophagy literally means ‘to eat oneself’. It is the cells way of recycling cytoplasmic components to give the cell a bit of a spring clean and get rid of any old or damaged proteins and organelles. As well as this homeostatic ‘spring cleaning’ role, autophagy can be upregulated in times of stress such as starvation to provide a source of amino acids. Autophagy can also act as a cell survival mechanism and a route to cell death depending on the circumstances……       

All in all I found writing my article really fun. I really enjoyed thinking of ways to make what can be a quite complex topic, simple and fun to read, whilst still making sure it had the information needed to answer a question on autophagy. I will certainly be writing another fastbleep article in the future and hope you will too!